The Hammer and Scorecard Part 3: Coincidence or Not?

In the previous article the discussion of how the Hammer and Scorecard software could be used in conjunction to effect the outcome of an election. What was originally designed to be used in foreign countries to spy on terrorist or governments not friendly to us, to interfere with their elections to put someone in power there who would be more favorable to the wishes of the US, is completely plausible. I believe there are people within our government who have such a hunger for power and control, coupled with a win at all cost mentality, it is very likely they would turn this technology against the American people to gain the outcome they want.

In this article we will build a timeline of events beginning in the early to mid 2000s and continue trough to the present. We will discuss the company know as Dominion and the role they play in our elections. When too many coincidences revolve around a singular event, they are no longer coincidence but a plot or a plan.

Upcoming software developer and designer Dennis L. Montgomery partners with Warren G. Trepp creating eTreppid Technologies in 1998. It was at this time he had developed software for noise filtering and video compression to enhance the quality of video. The targeted buyers for this type of software was the casinos in Las Vegas and New Jersey. Casinos need the very best in video surveillance to keep those in their operation honest and to catch any would be cheaters.

In 2004, eTreppid was awarded a $30 million government contract with the United States Special Operations Command to develop software to be used to track terrorist activity.

In 2006, after a dispute between Montgomery and Trepp over software ownership, Montgomery parted ways and started a new company named OpSpring with Billionaires Edra and Tim Blixseth. OpSpring was later named Blxware.

From 2006 to 2009, Montgomery designed and perfects what would become known as Hammer and Scorecard.

In 2009 after Edra and Tim divorced, Blxware became sole property of Edra and was liquidated, including all software and intellectual property. Through hours of research there has been no company or individual associated with the purchase, merger, or acquisition of Blxware. However, Dennis Montgomery has stated that the Hammer was seized by the Federal Government, specifically the DNI and Director of the CIA, Dennis Blair and Leon Panetta respectively.  

January 20, 2009 President Barak Obama was sworn into office as the 44th President of the United States.

In 2010 a Canadian company was buying up election system companies in the US. Dominion Votings Systems is that company. As of 2019 Dominion had voting machines in approximately 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states in the US alone. This makes up over 80% of of all voting machines in the country and in 2019, the state of Georgia selected Domino systems for its statewide voting system.

A list of states the system is used in:

  1. Washington

  2. California

  3. Nevada

  4. Alaska

  5. Utah

  6. Arizona

  7. Wyoming

  8. Colorado

  9. New Mexico

  10. Texas

  11. Kansas

  12. Minnesota

  13. Iowa

  14. Missouri

  15. Louisiana

  16. Wisconsin

  17. Illinois

  18. Michigan

  19. Indiana

  20. Tennessee

  21. Georgia

  22. Florida

  23. North Carolina

  24. Ohio

  25. Pennsylvania

  26. New York

  27. New Jersey

  28. Massachusetts

  29. Vermont

  30. New Hampshire

What becomes apparent is the system is used In primarily blue states and this years election, they were used every state that has been contested, has had irregularities, and similar voting problems: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. Coincidence? You decide.

In Part 4 we will go into what irregularities have been reported, which states have legal suits pending, and some scenarios of how the President & Vice President could be chosen if no candidate ends up with the needed 270 electoral votes.

Dean Ham

Oil and Gas Consultant, Constitutionalist, 2A advocate

https://dean-ham.com
Previous
Previous

The Hammer and Scorecard Part 4: Glitches or Fraud?

Next
Next

The Hammer and Scorecard: Part 2: The Maker and The Use