The Hammer and Scorecard: Part 2: The Maker and The Use

Photo from: coindesk.com

Let's start with a  recap from part 1 of this series. In the previous article software designer Dennis Montgomery worked with multiple government agencies including the CIA, DOD, DHS, NSA, and FBI developing software to protect the homeland in the mid 2000s. His work designed and built what is known as Hammer. It is a robust computer program ran by a supercomputer that has the ability penetrate protected networks without detection. Networks such as voting machines would be considered "protected networks". It was designed to be a foreign surveillance tool and was never intended to be used on the American people. 

In 2015 leaked information from some 47 hard drives, which would become known as the "Whistleblower Tapes", reveled startling evidence that this software was in fact used to spy on American citizens. The Us government has done its due diligence to ruin the reputation of Montgomery claiming him to be a "fraud" and a "con man". Meanwhile, in 2009 when the sole owner of Blxware, this is the company where Montgomery perfected the Hammer system, Edra Blixseth liquidated all personal assets. The liquidation of Blxware included all software and intellectual property. After many hours of research it has not been determined who or what entity purchased Blxware but Montgomery says it was "commandeered and repurposed" by John Brennan (CIA) and James Clapper (DNI). President Barak Obama took office on January 20, 2009.

Now that we have an understanding of Hammer and what it's purpose is, let's look at another computer program called "Scorecard". This program was designed to work in conjunction with Hammer to change vote tallies in real time. Since Hammer was designed to be used in foreign environments, one can conclude, the use of Scorecard would be to influence foreign elections to favor the US. Scorecard does its work during the data transfer of vote totals to reporting centers. It was designed to change approximately 3% of the vote to not raise suspicion and to go undetected. One can see how such a small discrepancy from one polling place would easily go unnoticed, but an unnoticed change of 3% from thousands of polling places would completely change the outcome of an election.

Let's take a look at one anomaly that happened during the 2020 election that raise questions about the security of our elections. In an article published by newrightnetwork.com outlining the Governors race in Kentucky between (D)Andy Beshear and (R)Matt Bevin. A video clip from CNN’s coverage of the election, the clip makes a strong case that Hammer & Scorecard were being used in this election. While watching the video in real time you don’t notice anything out of place. However, when the clip is slowed and viewed frame by frame you can see where Beshear has a 560 vote increase and simultaneously Bevin has a decrease of 560 votes. It raises questions as to the integrity of our systems and if they have been breached by those who believe they must win at all costs.

In part 3 of the series we will discuss further anomalies and “glitches” that have occurred during this election cycle and dive into some theories and possible ways this election could have been manipulated to favor one candidate.